Eli, That's cool! I did hear TypeMock's very powe...

2008-08-14T23:32:00.000+05:30

Eli, That's cool! I did hear TypeMock's very powerful. It's actually one of the [leading] contenders for our project [which I haven't gotten around to evaluate].

#2
--
So, I am not constrained by having to declare the method 'virtual'! Does this mean I can mock 'internal' / 'private' too?

#3
--
Fakes, uh? I didn't know what I was trying to do was a fake! Guess it's "working implementation & not production strength" and hence a fake :)

Good luck with the patch.You could use Typemock (w...

2008-08-14T18:58:00.000+05:30

Good luck with the patch.

You could use Typemock (with whom I'm associated with) and
1. Just stub/mock the non virtual methods.
2. Use "live" objects (your proposed syntax):
{
Demo demo = new Demo();
// Start Mocking
using (RecordExpectations recorder = new RecordExpectations())
{
recorder.ExpectAndReturn(demo.ReturnStringNoArgs(), "somestringbydefault").RepeatAlways();
}
}

3. Use the new AAA Syntax
Demo demo = Isolate.Fake.Instance<Demo>( Members.CallOriginal);
Isolate.WhenCalled(() => demo.ReturnStringNoArgs()).WillReturn("somestringbydefault");

Comments on C# and Everything .Net: Mocking Anomalies: Can't Override Non-Virtual Meth...

Eli, That's cool! I did hear TypeMock's very powe...

Good luck with the patch.You could use Typemock (w...